22 September 2016

Is It Really True That "They Are Either For Us or Against Us?"

19 Elul 5776

I just heard a very profound statement: "It looks as if the world is divided between those who are for us and those who are against us, but in reality, the whole world is against us."

And we don't even have a clue just how virulent the hatred really is.

(h/t Mystical Paths) Some pertinent excerpts:


EMAILS SHOW WHAT HILLARY HAS IN MIND FOR ISRAEL


...[In] September 2010 [Sandy Berger] sent Ms. Clinton ideas on how to pressure Israel to make concessions for peace. Mr. Berger acknowledged “how fragile Abbas’ political position [is],” and how “Palestinians are in disarray” and that “[f]ailure is a real possibility.” Mr. Berger was well aware, and informed Ms. Clinton, of the very real possibility that Israel would be placing its national security at grave risk in a deal that would very likely fail and lead to a Hamas takeover. But Mr. Berger felt the risks to Israeli lives were worth it. He advised making Mr. Netanyahu feel “uneasy about incurring our displeasure.”. . .

Anne Marie Slaughter, Clinton’s director of policy planning from 2009 to 2011,...wrote Ms. Clinton in September 2010, devising a scheme to encourage wealthy philanthropists to pledge millions to the Palestinians (which no doubt would have been embezzled by Abbas and his cronies, as were other funds). Ms. Slaughter writes, “This may be a crazy idea… Suppose we launched a ‘Pledge for Palestine’ campaign… Such a campaign among billionaires/multimillionaires around the world would reflect a strong vote of confidence in the building of a Palestinian state.”

She adds, “There would also be a certain shaming effect re Israelis, who would be building settlements in the face of a pledge for peace.”

Here’s how Clinton responded to this call for aiding “Palestine” and “shaming Israelis”: “I am very interested-pls flesh out. Thx.”

[Thomas] Pickering wrote Ms. Clinton on December 18, 2011, suggesting a secret plan to stir up major Palestinian protests in an attempt to force the Israeli government into peace negotiations. He stated that the protests “must be all and only women. Why? On the Palestinian side the male culture is to use force.”

Mr. Pickering’s goal was to ignite protests that would engulf the West Bank, “just like Tahrir Square.” He adds that the Palestinian “leadership has shied away from this idea because they can’t control it,” and they are “afraid of being replaced.”. . .

The idea was as dangerous for the Palestinians as it was for Israel. As Mr. Pickering admits, widespread protests could overthrow Abbas’ government, and if Palestinian men joined in, widespread violence would inevitably break out.

It would obviously be impossible to prevent men from participating in these demonstrations, yet Mr. Pickering felt this extreme risk was worth taking, even if it meant the replacement of Abbas with another Hamas-styled government—even if it meant violence breaking out across the West Bank, leading to a third intifada and the murder of countless Jews. He emphasized the need to hide all U.S. involvement in this plot. Ms. Clinton forwarded the email to Monica Hanley and asked her to “pls print.”

Clandestinely stirring up potentially violent protests in an attempt to force Israel to go against its best interests? Advice like this was par for the course when it came to Ms. Clinton’s advisers.

...These emails make it clear that, as Boteach says, key Clinton advisers were looking for ways, including manifestly irresponsible ones, to coerce Israel into making dangerous concessions to the Palestinians in exchange (from all that appears) for nothing.

These folks wouldn’t have sent such ideas to Clinton if they didn’t understand that she was looking for ways to accomplish the same goal.

11 comments:

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvoaBgaIxU

    ReplyDelete
  2. for those who can't picture america coming to an end

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXW2SDCvNPU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was built to last a long time.

      Delete
    2. Orthodox Jewish Father Of Five Victimized At Yankee Stadium – Hikind Says ‘Yankees Strike Out At Addressing A Bias Act’

      “Baseball is America’s favorite pastime, and people and their families attend a game to enjoy themselves. Imagine the pain and degradation Mr. Lapin experienced as this incident unfolded. He relayed to me how distraught he was and how it continued to negatively affect him for several days afterward, to the point that he was not able to enjoy his anniversary.


      Since when does a Jew have permission to "enjoy himself" and waste time watching goyim playing a game???

      This was a wake-up call. But, it's clear he didn't even hear it. His only concern is asserting his rights and making the perpetrators pay. :-(

      Hashem yerachem!

      Delete
  3. You can run, but you can not hide.
    Jack

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Regarding Orthodox the article about Jewish Father Of Five Victimized At Yankee Stadium, see Separated from the Nations, Undivided within Our Own - http://bit.ly/2cp56Qo

      Delete
    2. That is an excellent resource. Thanks for sending it.

      Delete
  4. Always takes a jew to do some real damage to us. (Im assuming this berger is jewish).

    On another note, were not doing enough to stem the animosity thats being ingrained in the masses against us. There is an abundance of antisemitic comments on youtube as well as videos that go unpunished and unrectified. Sick views and opinions together with a pathetic but deadly ideology, always saying the jews are to blame for everything whichever way you look at it. "Hollywood war movies are jewish "brainwashing" etc etc. These comments together with all the other antisemitsm out there slowly brainwash the ignorant masses out there and if we dont become proactive we will have 1939 all over again g-d forbid where words can turn into 6 million dead, and only then people step back and realise what their hate caused. dg

    ReplyDelete