22 December 2020


 7 Tevet 5781

Even among informed people, there is still a lot of misunderstanding about what is in the COVID-19 injection and how it works.  Take, for example this comment by an "Unknown" person self-identifying as a nurse...
"MRNA works specifically, on the bit of covid protein fragment that is being injected" ...
In fact, although we are not told exactly what IS being injected, we know it is not "bits of covid protein fragments" because we are informed by the following article from the CDC that whatever they ARE injecting into people is meant to teach the body's own cells how to replicate this viral protein which is then supposed to provoke an immune response similar to what a traditional vaccine would normally do.

mRNA vaccines are a new type of vaccine to protect against infectious diseases. To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, they teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. That immune response, which produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions for our cells to make a harmless piece of what is called the “spike protein.” The spike protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are given in the upper arm muscle. Once the instructions (mRNA) are inside the immune cells, the cells use them to make the protein piece. After the protein piece is made, the cell breaks down the instructions and gets rid of them. [Let's hope, anyway.]

Next, the cell displays the protein piece on its surface. Our immune systems recognize that the protein doesn’t belong there and begin building an immune response and making antibodies, like what happens in natural infection against COVID-19.
When I searched the internet by asking what is inside the mRNA vaccine, the answer I got was "snippets of genetic code."  I'm guessing that would be the copy of the code taken from the virus's own DNA which produces this particular protein.  That's where the (m)essenger RNA comes in, it somehow delivers this information to the chosen cells in the human body which for a designated space of time turns them into viral protein production facilities.
The genes in DNA encode protein molecules, which are the "workhorses" of the cell, carrying out all the functions necessary for life. For example, enzymes, including those that metabolize nutrients and synthesize new cellular constituents, as well as DNA polymerases and other enzymes that make copies of DNA during cell division, are all proteins.
In the simplest sense, expressing a gene means manufacturing its corresponding protein, and this multilayered process has two major steps. In the first step, the information in DNA is transferred to a messenger RNA (mRNA) molecule by way of a process called transcription. During transcription, the DNA of a gene serves as a template for complementary base-pairing, and an enzyme called RNA polymerase II catalyzes the formation of a pre-mRNA molecule, which is then processed to form mature mRNA (Figure 1). The resulting mRNA is a single-stranded copy of the gene, which next must be translated into a protein molecule. (Source)

Another component of the injection is apparently aborted fetal tissue cells, as otherwise, why would the Pope see fit to rule on its admissibility? 

VATICAN CITY, Dec 21 (Reuters) - The Vatican told Roman Catholics on Monday that it was morally acceptable for them to use COVID-19 vaccines, even if their production employed cell lines drawn from tissues of aborted fetuses.

A note from the Vatican's doctrinal congregation, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said the use of such vaccines was permitted as long as there were no alternatives.
Finally, we have to wonder if nanotechnology plays any part in all this.  As it happens, COVID-19 has put medical nanotechnology "on the map."

Two nanoparticle-based vaccines close to obtaining approval by the US Food and Drug Administration could represent a giant step in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. [BioNtech, Pfizer and Moderna]

...This new class of DNA- and RNA-based vaccines deliver the genetic sequence of specific viral proteins to the host cells using nanotechnology platforms.

...these vaccines are a huge achievement for molecular medicine and biotechnology. They also represent a big milestone for nanomedicine, which has struggled to gain mainstream recognition so far due to translation challenges. They are a success for all those scientists who have worked to optimize nanoformulations for the efficient packaging and safe delivery of genetic material.
To get a look at the possible downside of these injectibles (I still don't want to call them "vaccines"), we have to look back at a 2012 article which looks at what a UK Parliamentary investigative committee determined.

Nanotechnology, the manipulation of matter at the atomic and molecular scale to create materials with remarkably varied and new properties, is a rapidly expanding area of research with huge potential in many sectors, ranging from healthcare to construction and electronics. In medicine, it promises to revolutionize drug delivery, gene therapy, diagnostics, and many areas of research, development and clinical application. [Think $$$$$.]

...there are also concerned parties, who highlight that while the pace of research quickens, and the market for nanomaterials expands, it appears not enough is being done to discover their toxicological consequences.

This was the view of a science and technology committee of the House of Lords of the British Parliament, who in a recent report on nanotechnology and food, raise several concerns about nanomaterials and human health, particularly the risk posed by ingested nanomaterials.

For instance, one area that concerns the committee is the size and exceptional mobility of nanoparticles: they are small enough, if ingested, to penetrate cell membranes of the lining of the gut, with the potential to access the brain and other parts of the body, and even inside the nuclei of cells.

Another is the solubility and persistence of nanomaterials. What happens, for instance, to insoluble nanoparticles? If they can’t be broken down and digested or degraded, is there a danger they will accumulate and damage organs? Nanomaterials comprising inorganic metal oxides and metals are thought to be the ones most likely to pose a risk in this area.

Also, because of their high surface area to mass ratio, nanoparticles are highly reactive, and may for instance, trigger as yet unknown chemical reactions, or by bonding with toxins, allow them to enter cells that they would otherwise have no access to.

For instance, with their large surface area, reactivity and electrical charge, nanomaterials create the conditions for what is described as “particle aggregation” due to physical forces and “particle agglomoration” due to chemical forces, so that individual nanoparticles come together to form larger ones. This may lead not only to dramatically larger particles, for instance in the gut and inside cells, but could also result in disaggregation of clumps of nanoparticles, which could radically alter their physicochemical properties and chemical reactivity.

“Such reversible phenomena add to the difficulty in understanding the behaviour and toxicology of nanomaterials,” says the committee, whose overall conclusion is that neither Government nor the Research Councils are giving enough priority to researching the safety of nanotechnology, especially “considering the timescale within which products containing nanomaterials may be developed”.

They recommend much more research is needed to “ensure that regulatory agencies can effectively assess the safety of products before they are allowed onto the market”.
How fantastically convenient that this crisis came along which has allowed the "industry" to prove its worth without the bother with regulatory agencies' demands.

Now, who is going to go and explain it to the rabbis?  And remind them that only 0.1% of the population is actually at risk. [Even with inflated numbers!]  7 million deaths out of 7 billion population worldwide over the course of a year.  You do the math!

This is what all the rabbonim should be saying - at the very least.  This psak din from Bnei Braq basically says (if I am understanding it correctly) that not enough is presently known to rule for or against, but comes down on the side of not taking it until things are clearer.

(H/T SR)


  1. If these arrogant whatever are not the reincarnations of Nimrod and his vile followers, then I don't know who they can really be. We know that aliens do not exist. They think they are gods and have the right to do as they please on 8 billion human beings. When they will fall (not soon enough), they can never ever get up because they are beyond arrogant and we know H' will bring them down so hard, but when? H' is hastening the Geulah, so, hopefully, soon we will see their end. We are trying to understand how the Rabbis could be that clueless as to give it all a hechsher. Well, we know Chazal tell us that at keitz hayamim, 'most' of the Rabbis will be of the Erev Rav. Maybe, these famous & true rabbis are just being manipulated & misinformed, and maybe some are of the Erev Rav. That is why, the people, the real Jews, must just wake up and start thinking and figuring out for themselves and relying only on the Ribbono Shel Olam for our salvation. We have to pray with our own hearts, feelings and cry out from deep in our souls and not rely on others. H' is listening!

  2. Most of the reported deaths are with covid as measured by the PCR test not from covid. Most of the dead were not sick, not infected. The PCR only detected exposure to a virus.

    “If they could find this virus in you at all, and with PCR if you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody. It’s starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else, right I mean cause if you can amplify one single molecule up to something which you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of in your body. OK. So that can be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim that it’s meaningful….Those tests are all based on things that are invisible and the results are inferred in a sense. PCR is separate from that. It’s just a process that is used to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing that you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.” (Kary Mullis, part 2 48:53, Santa Monica, California, 12 July 1997, Host Esai Morales with Nobel Prize recipient Kary Mullis plus Sean Current, Paul Philpott, & Christine Maggiore. See also part 1)

  3. Two people sent me emails pointing to this video (Sassover Rebbe Slams COVID Vaccine, Calls Doctors “Murderers”) and this article about the video which include a partial translation from the Yiddish (WATCH: Sassover Rebbe Slams COVID Vaccine, Calls Doctors “Murderers”). It's worthwhile to read the comments under the video and understand what a battle is going on for the Truth.

    There is another article that contains some critical information, but I can't link to it here due to the source. It's such a biased article that it is instructive on the lengths TPTB will go to to influence and manipulate and ultimately control our thought processes. Therefore, I will just reference a few words to demonstrate what I am talking about and then you can figure it out for yourself.

    The title declares that "Orthodox" rabbis support the medical community and the government in its call for mass vaccination. And immediately undermines any opposing view as a "small but vocal group of anti-vaccine rabbis."

    They deride the troubling trend of "misinformation" (meaning anything outside the official narrative) being shared on WhatsApp and other (as yet) uncontrollable sources, not the least of which is encouragement of people to research the facts and decide for themselves, even though each one of us will stand alone before the Master of the Universe and give account for every decision made and course of action undertaken.

    The article proceeds to interview influential members of the chareidi community for their ideas on how to inspire more trust for the "authorities." They laud the efforts of the chief rabbis and mayor of Bnei Braq for demonstrating their own trust by publicly taking the vaccine in order to lure more communal members into accepting the vaccine and it goes on and on in that vein - like how to bring more people on board.

    What I continue to find most curious is that no effort whatsoever is being made to exclude the tens of thousands or perhaps, by now, even hundreds of thousands of people who are already immune by virtue of having survived a COVID-19 infection. I mean once you've had measles or chickenpox, etc., there is no need EVER for a vaccine. The infection served that purpose. Immunity - life long immunity - was already established. But, according to this article: "...the Center for Disease Control said even those who have recovered from COVID-19 and have some naturally acquired immunity may benefit from the vaccine." To which my response is: IN WHAT POSSIBLE WAY!? Such a nonsensical statement!

    I have no way of knowing why it is so important to The Powers That Should Not Be that every single individual be dosed with this injectable serum, but the very fact that it is so important to them that they are waging a war on Truth to get it out tells us already that it's not good for the Jews, nor anyone else!!

  4. Here is the actual article I was referencing above but hosted at a site I can link to...

    Orthodox Jewish leaders tell followers to vaccinate. Will they listen?

  5. Devash this is a shoah. To make Jews sterile is a shoah, to change the DNA of Jews is irreversible, who will want to marry with those? To shorten the life of old people, and to eliminate the connection with Hashem are also other goals of.those injections. It seems that whoever makes idolatry from flesh and blood( politicians, rabbis, celebrities etc) and will listen to their bad advice and get the poison will be punished. Hashem doesn't want us to trust modern rabbis it seems. I am tired with those.robots who, if they tell them jump out of the window will do it because the rav said so.
    Rabanim today are not rabanim of 100 years ago time to wake up. I will not take the vaccine i don't trust anyone only God.

  6. More prrof of important questions which have not yet been answered...

    Study investigates effects of COVID-19 vaccine on male fertility

    MIAMI – The University of Miami is investigating the possible effects of the coronavirus vaccine on male fertility.

    Lead researchers Dr. Ranjith Ramasamy, a reproductive urologist with U Health, initiated an earlier study which found the virus was present in the testicles for up to six months following infection.

    That spurred his team to question the virus’ effect on sperm and reproduction.

    His team is now looking at the potential impact of the vaccine as well.

    “We’re evaluating the sperm parameters and quality before the vaccine and after the vaccine. From the biology of the COVID vaccine we believe it shouldn’t affect fertility but we want to do the study to make sure that man who want to have kids in the future to assure them it’s safe to go ahead and get the vaccine,” Ramasamy said.

    Study participants must have a fertility evaluation before receiving the vaccine.

    To protect fertility, some men may want to consider freezing their sperm prior to vaccination.


    Because of the new formulation of this particular vaccine the MHRA wants to see more non-clinical data before finalising the advice in pregnancy. It is standard practice when waiting for such data on any medicine, to avoid its use in those who may become pregnant or who are breastfeeding. This will be kept under review as more evidence becomes available.

    What does this mean for me?
    Here are the key points you should consider until we have more evidence:

    if you are pregnant you should not be vaccinated – you can be vaccinated after your pregnancy is over
    if you think you may be pregnant you should delay vaccination until you are sure you are not
    if you are planning to get pregnant in the next three months, you should delay your vaccination
    if you know you are not pregnant you can start the two-dose course now and you should avoid getting pregnant until at least two months after the second dose
    if you have had the first dose and then become pregnant you should delay the second dose until after the pregnancy is over
    If you are breastfeeding you should wait until you have finished breastfeeding and then have the vaccine. If you were breastfeeding when you had the first dose you are advised not to have the second dose until you have finished breastfeeding.

    This advice is precautionary until additional evidence is available to support the use of this vaccine in pregnancy and breastfeeding. It may then be possible to have the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Until that advice is changed you may be able to have one of the other COVID-19 vaccines that are expected.

  8. This is a terribly disturbing report about the efforts of child educators to indoctrinate school children by teaching them how to recognize "fake news" which is only "fake" because they say it is.

    No, coronavirus vaccines aren’t made from aborted fetuses or created to control the population — and more lessons about fake news

    This is the latest installment of a weekly feature on this blog — lessons from the nonprofit News Literacy Project, which aims to teach students how to distinguish between what is real and what is not in an age of digital communication in which President Trump routinely denounces real news as “fake.”

    The material comes from the project’s newsletter, the Sift, which takes the most recent viral rumors, conspiracy theories, hoaxes and journalistic ethics issues and turns them into timely lessons with discussion prompts and links. The Sift, which is published weekly during the school year, has more than 10,000 subscribers, most of them educators.

    The News Literacy Project also offers a program called Checkology, a browser-based platform designed for students in grades 6 through 12 that helps prepare the next generation to easily identify misinformation. Checkology is available free to educators, students, school districts and parents. Since 2016, more than 29,000 educators and parents in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., have registered to use the platform. Since August 2020, more than 1,000 educators and parents and more than 34,000 students have actively used Checkology.

    ...The report lists some of the false vaccine narratives that have recently gained traction on social media:

    The human immune system is more effective than a vaccine (FALSE);
    Vaccines are fueled by “Big Pharma” profit, not public health (FALSE);
    News organizations are only reporting positive news about the vaccines at the behest of “Big Pharma” (FALSE);
    Coronavirus vaccines are a secret attempt to control the population (FALSE);
    The vaccines were developed using aborted fetal cells (FALSE).

    In fact, with the exception of point #4 which is as yet unproven, every other point labeled "false" is actually true.

    1. Saw this last night.
      https://summit.news/2020/12/22/university-develops-precognition-system-to-stop-disinformation-on-social-media/ Such bs. I'm so sick of these evildoers.

  9. MORE PROOF that important information is not getting into the hands of the general public...

    Public should be told that vaccines may have long term adverse effects

    We initiated a collaboration with Dr Jaakko Tuomilehto to study the effect of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine on the incidence of diabetes. Roughly 116 000 Finnish children were randomised to receive either four doses of the vaccine, starting at 3 months of age, or one dose at 24 months of age.3 We calculated the incidence of insulin dependent diabetes in both groups until age 10 and in a group that did not receive the vaccine—a cohort that included all 128 500 children born in Finland in the 24 months before the study of the vaccine began.

    A conference was held in Bethesda, Maryland, in May 1998 to discuss our data. At the conference we stated that the data on the vaccine support our published findings that immunisation starting after the age of 2 months is associated with an increased risk of diabetes. Our analysis is further supported by a similar rise in diabetes after immunisation with H influenzae type b vaccine in the United States4 and United Kingdom.5 Furthermore, the increased risk of diabetes in the vaccinated group exceeds the expected decreased risk of complications of H influenzae meningitis.

    Research into immunisation has been based on the theory that the benefits of immunisation far outweigh the risks from delayed adverse events and so long term safety studies do not need to be performed. When looking at diabetes—only one potential chronic adverse event—we found that the rise in the prevalence of diabetes may more than offset the expected decline in long term complications of H influenzae meningitis. Thus diabetes induced by vaccine should not be considered a rare potential adverse event. The incidence of many other chronic immunological diseases, including asthma, allergies, and immune mediated cancers, has risen rapidly and may also be linked to immunisation.

    We believe that the public should be fully informed that vaccines, though effective in preventing infections, may have long term adverse effects. An educated public will probably increasingly demand proper safety studies before widespread immunisation. We believe that the outcome of this decision will be the development of safer vaccine technology.

  10. Kudos to Samson for his comment which was 100% right!
    By reading all that is going on and thanks to Devash who brings out so much information so truth can be exposed to all who are interested in truth. Now here's where the trouble is, most people don't want to know the truth because it's much easier to believe the absolute lies that are so easily attainable. Just open the TV, newspapers, etc. and everything is all out there for everyone to see and read, so why worry about the truth. The public (not all, B'H) are so brainwashed, so the easy way takes no effort. But, these fools don't realize the easy way they take will lead them to their downfall. Those who understand will get tired of trying to be the saviors because it's like talking to the wall. We pray, that H', in His Infinite Mercy, will save Bnai Yisrael and the righteous, in spite of ourselves and the stupid fools who do not want to learn the truth. Maybe the birur also includes knowing who the real rabbis, judges, doctors, etc. are by them showing courage to stand up against evil but standing up for the Truth!

  11. Johns Hopkins Newspaper Removes Study Examining COVID Death Rate

    Johns Hopkins University’s student newspaper, the News-Letter, reported on a university presentation stating that COVID-19 “had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people” and that the virus “has also not increased the total number of deaths” in comparison to historical data. However, the paper later removed the article, stating that it had been used to support “dangerous inaccuracies” on social media.

    Assistant Director for the university’s Applied Economics program Genevieve Briand critically analyzed the net effect of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States based on historical data. Using information from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Briand identified the percentages of total deaths per age category both before and after the pandemic began.

    “Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19,” said the News-Letter’s article.

    “Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.”

    Though deaths in categories like respiratory illnesses and heart disease seasonally rise and fall together in the United States, Briand noticed a strange trend.
    Johns Hopkins Newspaper Removes Study Examining COVID Death Rate

    “Instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease,” in addition to “all other causes.” Additionally, “the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19.”

    “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded in her presentation. She told the News-Letter that “a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification.”

  12. Hospital Workers Turn Down COVID Vaccine: "There's Too Much Mistrust"
    Less than a week after we reported on widespread resistance among healthcare workers in one Chicago hospital, BeckersHospitalReview.com's Ayla Ellison reports that the virus of vaccine mistrust is spreading...

    Many employees at Howard University Hospital in Washington, D.C., have reservations about taking the COVID-19 vaccine, and CEO Anita Jenkins is trying to get workers to follow her lead by getting vaccinated, according to CNN.

    The hospital, a major healthcare provider for the Black community, received 725 doses of the Pfizer vaccine Dec. 15 and expects to receive a second shipment this week. As of Dec. 18, only about 600 of the hospital's 1,900 employees had signed up for the shots, according to Kaiser Health News.

    "There is a high level of mistrust and I get it," Ms. Jenkins told Kaiser Health News.

    "People are genuinely afraid of the vaccine."

    The vaccination numbers, though low, still exceeded expectations, Ms. Jenkins told CNN. An internal hospital survey of about 350 employees in early November showed that 70 percent were not willing to take the COVID-19 vaccine or would not take it immediately after it became available.

    Ms. Jenkins received the shot Dec. 15 in hopes of inspiring staff to get vaccinated. She's part of a widespread effort by healthcare experts and community leaders to combat vaccine hesitancy among Black Americans. About 35 percent of Black Americans said they probably or definitely would not get the vaccine if it was determined to be safe by scientists and widely available for free, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation study cited by CNN.

    Howard University Hospital isn't the only healthcare provider with workers who turned down the vaccine.

    At Doctors Hospital at Renaissance in Edinburg, Texas, so many workers declined the COVID-19 vaccine that the hospital offered doses to other medical workers in the region, according to ProPublica.

    The hospital received 5,850 doses of the vaccine, and it quickly became clear that not enough people eligible for the vaccine, like staff who work directly with COVID-19 patients, were opting to get it, DHR Health CMO Robert Martinez, MD, told ProPublica.

    "You start to see similar numbers across the country, all this mistrust and misinformation," Dr. Martinez said.

    After the first day of distribution, DHR reached out to other hospitals and healthcare facilities in the region to offer doses of the vaccine. ProPublica reported that the vaccine ended up going to non-medical personnel as well, including state Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr. He told ProPublica he was invited to take the vaccine by DHR after officials explained to him that all eligible workers who wanted the vaccine received it.

    In short, as we noted previously, nobody wants to be a guinea pig.